A 34-year-old flight attendant who felt unwell before boarding a flight to Milan never recovered. Sun, an EVA Air crew member, fell ill during the September 25, 2025, journey and died less than three weeks later, prompting scrutiny of how the airline handles crew medical emergencies. The incident has ignited debate over workplace safety culture at the Taiwanese carrier.

Age: 34 · Airline: EVA Air · Death date: October 10, 2025 · Suspected cause: Adult-onset Still’s Disease (AOSD) · Incident flight: BR95 (Milan–Taipei)

Quick snapshot

1Confirmed facts
  • 34-year-old attendant surnamed Sun died October 10, 2025 (Taiwan News)
  • Fell ill on flight BR95 to Milan, condition worsened on return (One Mile at a Time)
  • EVA Air launched internal investigation (Straits Times)
2What’s unclear
  • Whether AOSD is confirmed or still under investigation
  • Full details of cabin manager’s account and crew testimonies
  • Pre-existing health status before the Milan assignment
  • Official autopsy results and cause-of-death determination
3Timeline signal
  • September 25, 2025: Fell ill during outbound, worsened on return
  • September 25, 2025: Airport injection, hospital referral
  • October 10, 2025: Death at China Medical University Hospital
  • October 13, 2025: Unions called for workplace bullying probe
4What’s next
  • Taoyuan City Office of Labor Inspection conducting official inquiry
  • Unions assessing whether manager’s actions constitute workplace bullying
  • Policy review on inflight medical protocols and sick leave culture
Detail Information
Victim’s age 34
Surname Sun ( )
Death date October 10, 2025
Incident flight BR95 (Milan–Taipei)
Illness onset September 25, 2025
Reported cause Adult-onset Still’s Disease (AOSD)
Hospital where she died China Medical University Hospital, Taichung
Airline response Apology and internal investigation announced

What happened to EVA Air?

EVA Air, Taiwan’s second-largest carrier, found itself at the center of a workplace safety controversy in October 2025. A viral social media post drew attention to the death of a cabin crew member, sparking widespread criticism of how the airline handles medical emergencies involving its own staff.

Flight details

Sun, a 34-year-old flight attendant, reported for duty on an EVA Air flight to Milan on September 25, 2025. She had felt unwell before even boarding the outbound flight to Milan, but still proceeded with the assignment. During the return leg—flight BR95 from Milan Malpensa to Taipei—her condition deteriorated significantly.

A passenger on the return flight reported seeing Sun visibly unwell while still serving meals, according to FTV News coverage. Upon landing at Taoyuan Airport, Sun received an injection for pain and fever, then was referred to hospital care.

The pattern

Sun sought treatment at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Linkou before being transferred to China Medical University Hospital in Taichung, where she died on October 10, 2025—15 days after first falling ill on duty.

Timeline of events

The sequence of events spans approximately two and a half weeks, beginning when Sun felt unwell prior to her Milan assignment and ending with her death in a Taichung hospital.

Date Event
September 25, 2025 (outbound) Felt unwell during flight to Milan
September 25, 2025 (return) Condition worsened on flight BR95
September 25, 2025 Airport treatment, injection at Taoyuan, hospital referral
October 1, 2025 Medical testing reportedly conducted
October 10, 2025 Death at China Medical University Hospital, Taichung
October 11, 2025 EVA Air notified of the death
October 13, 2025 Taoyuan Flight Attendants’ Union called for formal investigation
Bottom line: The implication: the airline had nearly two weeks between being informed of the serious illness on October 11 and the public outcry that followed, yet the controversy surrounding cabin crew care procedures persisted.

What was the cause of the EVA Air flight attendant’s death?

Medical professionals suspected Adult-onset Still’s Disease (AOSD), a rare autoimmune condition, as the cause of Sun’s rapid decline. Doctors identified a rheumatology-related issue on September 25, 2025, according to Taiwan News, the same day she was hospitalized.

Reported medical condition

AOSD is a rare inflammatory disorder that typically affects adults, causing symptoms including fever, rash, and joint pain. The disease can progress rapidly in severe cases, though it remains uncommon and diagnosis often takes time. No confirmed pre-existing condition has been reported for Sun, though online commenters have questioned whether underlying health issues may have contributed.

The suspected AOSD diagnosis came from initial hospital assessments at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Linkou, where Sun was first treated upon arrival from Milan. She was subsequently transferred to China Medical University Hospital in Taichung for continued care.

Distinction from other reports

Early headlines and some secondary reports referenced “acute liver failure” in connection with Sun’s death, but primary sources including Taiwan News make no mention of this condition. The medical focus appears to have been on the suspected autoimmune condition rather than liver involvement, at least in the publicly available information from hospital assessments.

What to watch

The distinction between AOSD and acute liver failure matters: one is a rare but identifiable autoimmune disease, the other suggests potential occupational exposure or systemic health neglect. The gap in confirmed medical information leaves room for speculation about what actually caused Sun’s death.

How did EVA Air respond?

EVA Air issued a public apology and announced an internal investigation into the circumstances surrounding Sun’s death. The airline confirmed it was informed of the death on October 11, 2025, and indicated it was providing support to Sun’s family.

Apology issued

The airline’s apology addressed concerns raised in the viral social media post that first brought attention to the incident. The post accused EVA Air of failing to protect its employees when medical emergencies arise, and of maintaining a culture that discourages crew members from taking sick leave.

EVA Air acknowledged responsibility for the handling of Sun’s case, particularly the decisions made regarding medical assistance during the return flight. The airline stated it was reviewing its protocols for crew medical emergencies.

Internal investigation

Beyond the internal review, the Taoyuan Flight Attendants’ Union and EVA Airways Corporate Union announced they would jointly investigate whether the cabin manager’s actions constituted workplace bullying. The cabin manager, for her part, claims she checked on the crew before the return flight and that Sun did not request medical help in Milan.

Taoyuan City Office of Labor Inspection dispatched officials to examine the case, making it a formal regulatory matter rather than simply an internal airline concern.

“this was not some regrettable coincidence, but the result of systemic and long-term indifference to crew members’ health.” — Fellow EVA Air flight attendant (One Mile at a Time)

The catch: the cabin manager’s decision not to contact Medlink—the standard inflight medical consultation protocol—appears to be a procedural failure regardless of whether Sun explicitly requested help. Aviation commenters have noted that the protocol exists precisely for situations where crew members may be reluctant to speak up about their health.

How much do EVA Air flight attendants make?

The controversy has drawn attention to working conditions at EVA Air, including compensation structures that union members claim create pressure against taking sick leave. Understanding the financial context helps explain why crew members may hesitate to report health concerns mid-flight.

Salary range

According to employee-reported data, EVA Air flight attendants earn monthly salaries ranging from approximately NT$48,000 to NT$72,000, depending on experience and seniority. Total compensation—including allowances and bonuses—can push annual earnings higher, but the performance review system ties these bonuses to attendance metrics.

Glassdoor data

Glassdoor reviews from current and former EVA Air employees cite a “high-pressure” service culture where attendance records factor significantly into evaluations. Several reviews mention reluctance to take sick days due to concerns about how it would affect performance scores and bonus eligibility.

The upshot

Union members describe a culture where taking sick leave carries reputational and financial consequences. For a 34-year-old crew member feeling unwell before a long-haul flight, the incentive to push through rather than report symptoms creates structural risk—for her and potentially for passengers too.

What is EVA Air doing about crew welfare?

The airline’s response extends beyond this single incident. EVA Air has committed to reviewing its medical protocols and sick leave policies, though specific changes had not been announced as of late October 2025.

Possible policy shifts

The Taoyuan Flight Attendants’ Union has called for clearer guidelines on when Medlink must be contacted and when crew members displaying symptoms should be relieved of duties. The union argues that current protocols place too much discretion in the hands of individual cabin managers.

The EVA Airways Corporate Union’s joint involvement suggests that management and labor are negotiating over how to balance service delivery expectations with crew health protections. One proposed change involves removing or reducing the performance penalty for sick leave taken under documented medical circumstances.

Health protocol review

EVA Air’s internal investigation is examining whether proper procedures were followed during Sun’s return flight, particularly regarding the decision not to contact Medlink or arrange wheelchair assistance. The Taoyuan City Office of Labor Inspection’s parallel inquiry carries regulatory weight that could compel policy changes if violations are found.

“The manager’s failure to at least contact Medlink is problematic, and perhaps was a violation of the airline’s procedures.” — Aviation industry commenter Timtamtrak (One Mile at a Time)

Bottom line: Why this matters: the incident has globalized, fueling anger over what many see as a failure of cabin leadership to prioritize crew safety over operational continuity. Simple Flying’s coverage noted that the case resonates beyond Taiwan because similar pressures exist at other high-service carriers.

Confirmed facts

  • 34-year-old Sun died October 10, 2025
  • Fell ill on flight BR95, September 25, 2025
  • Airline launched internal investigation
  • Taoyuan unions investigating for workplace bullying
  • Medlink not contacted during return flight

Unverified claims

  • Whether AOSD is officially confirmed
  • Exact layover duration and actions in Milan
  • Pre-flight health status
  • Specific policy changes under consideration
  • Manager’s full account of events

Related reading: Fang Da Tong Passed Away: Khalil Fong Dies at 41 After Illness · Lee Hui Li Husband: Microsoft Singapore MD Passes During Sabbatical

Additional sources

youtube.com, youtube.com

Frequently asked questions

What was the reported cause of death?

Medical professionals suspected Adult-onset Still’s Disease (AOSD), a rare autoimmune condition. The diagnosis was preliminary and based on initial hospital assessments at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and China Medical University Hospital. No official autopsy confirmation has been publicly reported.

When did the incident occur?

Sun fell ill during the September 25, 2025, flight from Milan to Taipei (flight BR95). She died at China Medical University Hospital in Taichung on October 10, 2025—15 days after first becoming unwell during her EVA Air assignment.

What controversy surrounded EVA Air’s response?

A viral social media post accused EVA Air of failing to provide adequate medical assistance to Sun during the return flight. Specifically, the cabin manager allegedly declined to contact Medlink, refused wheelchair or ambulance assistance upon landing, and failed to properly assess Sun’s condition. Both unions are investigating whether this constitutes workplace bullying.

Who was the flight attendant involved?

The flight attendant was a 34-year-old crew member with the surname Sun ( ). She had been employed by EVA Air and was working flight BR95 from Milan to Taipei when she fell ill. She sought treatment upon arrival in Taoyuan and was subsequently hospitalized before passing away two weeks later.

What changes is EVA Air considering?

EVA Air announced an internal investigation and committed to reviewing its medical protocols for inflight crew emergencies. The Taoyuan unions are pushing for clearer guidelines on when Medlink must be contacted and for reforms to sick leave policies that currently discourage crew members from reporting health concerns.

Was the death linked to working conditions?

The connection remains under investigation. While the medical cause appears to be AOSD, union representatives argue that the structural pressure to work while unwell—and the failure to activate proper medical protocols—represents a systemic problem at EVA Air that contributed to the outcome. The Taoyuan City Office of Labor Inspection is examining whether regulatory violations occurred.

Where did the flight originate?

The incident flight originated in Milan, Italy (Milan Malpensa Airport, MXP). Sun was part of the crew on the outbound leg to Milan and the return journey to Taipei (TPE). She became unwell during the flight and her condition worsened on the return leg on September 25, 2025.

For Taiwanese airline passengers, the lesson is uncomfortable: the crew members serving your meals may be operating under pressure to conceal health problems that could compromise their ability to respond in an emergency. Until EVA Air implements concrete reforms to sick leave policies and mandatory medical consultation protocols, the structural incentive to prioritize service over safety remains intact.

Bottom line: EVA Air faces institutional accountability for how it treats crew health emergencies after the death of a 34-year-old flight attendant who fell ill on a Milan flight. Flight attendants: demand protocol changes that remove discretion from individual managers on medical emergencies. Passengers: recognize that crew wellness directly affects your safety, not just employee HR metrics.